Sunday, September 22, 2013

Movie Review: Prisoners

The first film of the Oscar season comes in the form of a intense thriller called Prisoners. Is it a potential Oscar contender? and does director Denis Villeneuve's reinvent a genre that is filled with cliche twist and turns? Let's check it out.



Prisoners revolves around two families the Dover's and Birch's, whose youngest children are kidnapped after a normal thanksgiving dinner. With Detective Loki (Jake Gyllenhaal) on the case and producing little results, Keller Dover (Hugh Jackman) takes things into his own hands. Capturing a possible suspect named Alex Jones (Paul Dano) whose mind is at the same level as a 10 year old, and torturing him for information. From there the film turns into a character study about how far someone will go to find their children.

The most compelling part of this thriller is the dynamics of both Keller and Franklin (Terrence Howard) and how they handle the loss of their children. Keller clearly the more aggressive of the two uses his rage and determination to manipulate Franklin into doing things that are inhuman. Though Franklin does comply in these situations it affects him, causing him to spend the majority of the film in a depressed state. That is not to say that everyone else is doing well, everyone is in a gloomy state but Howard projected it masterfully. Every member of the cast gave strong performances but for me Howard and Gyllenhaal stood out. Unfortunately, after the first hour Howard disappears for the next hour of the film, due to the films intent on focusing it's run time on Loki and Kellen Dover. Jackman and Gyllenhaal carry the film with ease even with the eye twitching of detective Loki can throw you off for a while. I was very against it, until I realized it was something his character did when stressed or nervous. The acting clearly was the strong point of the film, and was worth the price of admission.

The story is very gut wrenching and it should stick with you well after the movie is over. Especially if you are a parent, the thought of this happening to a child of your own may make the film hard to watch. I do not have a child, but I do realize how emotionally invested parents can get in a kidnapping film. I was also extremely impressed with the tastefulness of the torturing of Alex White. I was expecting it to get very bloody like a horror film and it wasn't. Besides a few punches the rest of the torture happened off screen only allowing us to imagine what is happening via Alex's screams. The film is undeniable long, at 2 hours and 26 min and it feels every bit of that. It never retracted me from the movie but it will hurt its rewatch value. The last hour of the film is filled with jarring twist and turns that I felt tied together very well. I could see how the suspension of belief may be to much to ask for a some people, especially when the first hour and a half is so plausible. I won't argue that the last half hour is chalked full of twist that weren't exactly necessary, but it had me trying to piece everything together only to fail. I think the majority of people won't be able to predict every aspect of the story until it happens. Another complaint amongst the group I was with was the sudden ending of the film. I was very pleased with it cause i felt the director didn't need to spend an hour telling me what was obvious. At first it was rather jarring but in the end another 30 minutes of run time would have hurt the film.

I have said a lot about this film and hopefully it persuaded you to see it. I had a really good time watching the movie even when the material is anything but a good time. It may not have spent enough time on some things they glanced over in particular the end results, but Prisoners is an engaging and well acted thrill ride. Is it an Oscar Contender? I really doubt it, if anything Jake Gyllenhaal or Terrence Howard may pull out a nomination but there are so many performances left to be seen. Even if it doesn't get any Oscars you won't be disappointed at the end result of Prisoners.

Verdict: 4 out of 5

Sunday, September 15, 2013

Movie Review: The Way Way Back



Nothing fits better into the summer season than a unknown indie flick. When every week you are greeted with bombastic actions sequences and visual extravaganzas, its nice to take a breather from it all. This breather comes in the form of a little known independent film called The Way Way Back. Is it worth your time, or even your money? Let's find out.

Plot Summery Via IMDB

Shy 14-year-old Duncan goes on summer vacation with his mother, her overbearing boyfriend (Steve Carrell), and her boyfriend's daughter. Having a rough time fitting in, Duncan finds an unexpected friend in Owen (Sam Rockwell), manager of the Water Wizz water park.

The story is nothing special, and I will be the first one to admit it. However, the cliche story is pushed into the background behind it's complex and compelling characters who make every moment of this film worth seeing. The person who really stands out is the always spectacular Sam Rockwell, who spits jokes out of his mouth that would put Tony Stark to shame (Sorry RDJ). I am a firm believer that any film with Rockwell is a better film, and i would watch a movie where he talks to himself for 2 hours. Oh yeah, I've done that it's called Moon and its spectacular. Let's stop kissing Sam Rockwell's ass for a second and talk about other people in the film. Steve Carrell gives an odd performance, unlike anything he has done and surprisingly it worked rather well. Even when at times seeing him as a douchbag feels so wrong. The kid named Duncan gave a solid performance for a young actor, but I've seen better from Logan Lerman (Perks Of Being A Wallflower) and Tye Sheridan (Mud). Maya Rudolph brought a calming grounded presence to the wacky world of Water Wizz, while on the opposite spectrum Nat Faxon and Jim Rash who also direct the film brought a handful of chuckles to chew up the screen when Rockwell wasn't saying anything. Everyone did a fine job, and nobody really struck me in the wrong way.

There was some problems with the script for me, in particular the way Steve Carrel's daughter was written. While funny, her lines were essentially a to the extreme prissy popular girl. The writing also may have faltered with AnnaSophia Robb's character, who was Duncan's love interest. She wasn't given a lot to work with and came off rather bland. She did have this awkward young love chemistry with Liam James, which did help the very few intimate scenes. The film did lack a real emotional punch that I have come to find in films like this. It to me is the polar opposite of last years Perks of Being Wallflower which isn't exactly a bad thing. The story its cliche and predictable but for the first time in a long time, I say who cares. This was the Sam Rockwell show, it was a heartfelt, enjoyable and downright charming comedy that I will love to see again. Even if the writing wasn't perfect and Sam Rockwell did over shine anyone and everyone on screen, it is still a film the large majority will enjoy. Go see this film if it's still in theaters, if not wait patiently for it to come on DVD.

Did I say Sam Rockwell enough?

Verdict 4 out of 5

Way to early 86th Academy Award Predictions

Oscar season is only a quick hop into the future, and potential nominees are making their trips around to various festivals promoting their films. Without seeing any films that are garnering Oscar buzz (outside Fruitvale Station and Mud) the time for my Oscar Predictions are now. With undeniable knowledge and  dumb luck, I will be predicting the major categories in the 86th Academy Awards. If you are unaware, these categories consist of Best Picture, Best Director, Best Actress, Actor, and Supporting Actor, Supporting Actress and Best Animated film for fun. Here we go.


Best Picture


Gravity
Twelve Years A Slave
Inside Llewyn Davis
The Monuments Men
Wolf Of Wall Street
American Hustle
Saving Mr. Banks

I am giving the nod here to Twelve Years A Slave, though at this point who really knows. I know I don't. However due to its fantastic reviews, emotion story arc and the potential of world class performances, this one could go for a sweep. Last years Django Unchained was essentially a semi-comical slave film that garnered a Best Picture nod. Twelve Years A Slave is going for pure emotional punch and it seems to have achieved that. (Runner up for me was Gravity)

Best Director

Steve McQueen- Twelve Years A Slave
Alfonso Cuaron- Gravity
Coen Brothers- Inside Llewyn Davis
Martin Scorcese- Wolf Of Wall Street
David O. Russel- American Hustle

Due to its technical prowess and overall beauty, I think Alfonso Cuaron will get it this year for Gravity. Much like Ang Lee won last year with the stunning film Life of Pi. Though stats show that it's rather rare for this to happen, I believe whoever wins Best Picture won't take home the award for Best Director.

Best Actor

Chitwel Elojifer- Twelve Years A Slave
Christian Bale- Out Of The Furnace
Idris Elba- Mandela: Long Road To Freedom
Leonardo DiCaprio- Wolf Of Wall Street
Michael B. Jordan- Fruitvale Station

I have been predicting DiCaprio to win for years now, only to see him go home empty handed. Once again I am going to take that bet and give him one last go. Though I would find it sad to see him win for a role that is more comical than some of his truly great performances, I would be ecstatic to see it.


Best Actress

Cate Blanchett- Blue Jasime
Sandra Bullock- Gravity
Meryl Streep- Osage: August County
Amy Adams- American Hustle
Emma Thompson- Saving Mr. Banks

This will be the one performance that may push Gravity into the winning circles of Best Picture. Sandra Bullock has won before and is beloved by the academy. Not to mention she has to carry a film where she acts solely in front of a green screen, hanging from wires like a marionette. She is stuck in space! how creepy is that, and reviews have pointed towards here towering performance.

Best Supporting Actor

Michael Fassbender- Twelve Years A Slave
Tom Hanks- Saving Mr. Banks
Daniel Bruhl- Rush
Matthew McConaughey- Mud
James Gandolfini- Enough Said

Though DiCaprio could garner a nomination for his performance as a plantation owner last year. I doubt Fassbender will be that full of life and comical, it will be a villainous and gut wrenching performance. One that will brand itself into audiences brains, giving Twelve Years A Slave its first Oscar Win.

Best Supporting Actress

Oprah Winfrey- Lee Daniels: The Butler
Luptia Nyong'o- Twelve Years A Slave
Jennifer Lawrence- American Hustle
Naomi Harris- Mandela: Long Road To Freedom
Octavia Spencer- Fruitvale Station

I have no idea about this category, hence why I just followed my game plan and chose a Twelve Years A Slave actor. To give me some validity people have raved about her performance, whoever she is.

Animated Film

The Wind Rises
Monsters University
Frozen
Ernest & Celestine

Though many people don't know this film, I have probably my strongest argument of this whole article about The Wind Rises. What makes this film a sure fire winner is legendary Director Hayao Miyazaki. I believe that he has garnered 2 nominations (Ponyo and Spirited Away) and the latter won. What makes him such a sure fire winner is the fact that it;s his final film in his illustrious career. What better way to acknowledge such a career, than giving him one final award. If he doesn't win, expect Frozen to be a massive hit and for a lifetime achievement award to follow in the upcoming years. Not to mention this year is what I consider one of the poorest for truely great animated films.